What are women, but champions of conflicting emotions and cognitions held simultaneously?! Both equally valid too.
I do not imagine that the statements I journal would fit well into a philosophical syllogism. I can picture Dr. Rimm telling me that one or the other of my emotions are valid, but both can't be valid. I believe he may even refer to the law of non-contradiction: the basic law of logic which states that it is not possible for something to be and not be at the same time. Well, Dr. Rimm, just peruse my journal and we'll have ourselves a debate.
Given my logic, perhaps we're both right.
No comments:
Post a Comment